home materials & merchandise hotline calendar press links   


I am  

I need  
ProgramsHIV/AIDS and HealthAbout GMHCPublic Policy and ActivismVolunteerEn EspanolDonate

  About GMHC > Press Release Archive > Press Release

For Immediate Release
November 28, 2005

Contacts:
Lynn Schulman, 212.367.1210
Noel Alicea, 212.367.1216

 

GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS JOINS WITH PROGRESSIVE VOICES ACROSS THE COUNTRY IN OPPOSING THE NOMINATION OF SAMUEL ALITO

NEW YORK — The confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court is likely to lead to the erosion, if not outright reversal, of hard won legal rights and protections for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) and HIV/AIDS communities. With conservative Justice John Roberts already confirmed to the Supreme Court, Gay Men's Health Crisis (GMHC) views opposition to Judge Alito's confirmation as critical to every person who values privacy, civil rights, and personal freedom.

"This nomination is a direct threat to the hard won gains by the LGBT and HIV/AIDS communities over the years," said GMHC executive director Ana Oliveira. "It signals a reversal of privacy guarantees and deepens the division between those with access to civil rights and those who often rely on the Supreme Court as the last avenue of redress ­ especially women, people of color, the disabled and others pushed to the periphery of society."

A review of Judge Alito's record underscores GMHC's concerns. As Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Reagan administration, Alito helped write the Justice Department's 1986 opinion upholding employment discrimination against people with AIDS. Federal law, the opinion stated, does not prohibit employers from firing workers with AIDS based on "[f]ear of contagion, whether reasonable or not." In response to this ruling, localities around the country began to enact antidiscrimination measures and thereby do what the federal government refused to do: protect the civil rights of people with HIV. Still, Alito held firm, saying the response "hasn't shaken our belief in the rightness of our opinion."

During his tenure on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Alito repeatedly sought to impose undue and impossible burdens on women, people with disabilities, victims of racial discrimination, and refugees seeking merely to have their day in court. Two cases in particular, Sheridan v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. and Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh alleging sex discrimination and sexual harassment, respectively, offer a glimpse into what working class women might expect from Supreme Court Justice Alito. Despite the egregious conduct of their employers, Alito endorsed a standard of proof that would have made it all but impossible for any victim of discrimination to take their case to trial. Likewise, his colleagues on the Third Circuit cautioned that if Alito's interpretation in a racial discrimination case prevailed, the federal law prohibiting employment discrimination "would be eviscerated."

Alito has often seemed impervious to the reality and legacy of racism. As Assistant Solicitor General, he signed a government amicus brief opposing an affirmative action plan and comparing it to slavery. He has also voiced his opposition to Civil Rights era "one man, one vote" rulings.

Another grave concern is the threat Judge Alito poses to the tenuous separation of Church and State. In recently released documents he notes his disagreement with Supreme Court rulings in the 1960s that upheld this partition.

If confirmed, Alito may well be the vote that overturns or fatally undermines Roe v. Wade. In 1985, Alito wrote proudly of his role in the government's argument that "that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion." If indeed the newly constituted court eliminates the right to abortion, all reproductive rights and freedoms will be curtailed, access to health care in general will be compromised; rights to bodily privacy will be jeopardized.

As we approach the 25th year of AIDS, we cannot allow the very institutions we rely on to safeguard our rights to become instruments of disfranchisement. The confirmation of Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court will mean the further dissolution of civil liberties and civil rights. GMHC calls on the Senate to reject this nominee.

GMHC is a not-for-profit, volunteer-supported and community-based organization committed to national leadership in the fight against AIDS. GMHC provides services and programs to over 15,000 men, women and families that are living with or affected by HIV/AIDS in New York City. For more information, please visit www.gmhc.org.

 

© 2005 Gay Men's Health Crisis


   HELP GMHC FIGHT AIDS!
Make a secure donation today.

Donation Information >


 
 

   Contact  |  Careers & Internships  |  Using This Site  |  Suggestion Box  |  Disclaimer



Gay Men's Health Crisis, The Tisch Building, 119 West 24 Street, New York, NY 10011, 212.367.1000
Press and media: Lynn Schulman, lynns@gmhc.org

CDC Disclaimer: This site contains HIV prevention messages that may not be appropriate for all audiences.

design by double k design